Don't know what point you're trying to make.Because thats the frame of reference most understandable here. We can use indigenous Australians, west Africans where part of my heritage is from, native Americans. Same story
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't know what point you're trying to make.Because thats the frame of reference most understandable here. We can use indigenous Australians, west Africans where part of my heritage is from, native Americans. Same story
That it was a good thing that neolithic cultures were colonized, wherever that may have been.Don't know what point you're trying to make.
Don't know what point you're trying to make.Because thats the frame of reference most understandable here. We can use indigenous Australians, west Africans where part of my heritage is from, native Americans. Same story
Total horseshit. You do not need to be colonised to benefit from the ideas and technologies of other cultures. The MRI was not invented by a New Zealander or Briton, nor was the plane, the car, countless other inventions and ideas. Most of these things arrived here through trade and cultural exchange. It is totally unnecessary to colonise a country for it to benefit from these things. Framing colonisation as something that was necessary to improve a country or people is pure rationalisation/justification of a crime.That it was a good thing that neolithic cultures were colonized, wherever that may have been.
Really? The Sentinelese people are getting MRI's? Thats prime example of non colonized neolithic tribes. Have they achieved trade and cultural exchange?Don't know what point you're trying to make.
Total horseshit. You do not need to be colonised to benefit from the ideas and technologies of other cultures. The MRI was not invented by a New Zealander or Briton, nor was the plane, the car, countless other inventions and ideas. Most of these things arrived here through trade and cultural exchange. It is totally unnecessary to colonise a country for it to benefit from these things. Framing colonisation as something that was necessary to improve a country or people is pure rationalisation/justification of a crime.
No, because they don't want to. That's self-determination. The right of all peoples.Really? The Sentinelese people are getting MRI's? Thats prime example of non colonized neolithic tribes. Have they achieved trade and cultural exchange?
View attachment 12006
I watched a Xi speech where he proposed doing just that, but he called it de-colonialising. Wish we had some fluent Chinese speakers on here to tell us if the subtitles are accurate translations, and what he meant by that.I'm sure if say, China, came here and colonised/took over this country and banned gambling and alcohol and sugary drinks (all of which cause enormous harm) you'd give the whole colonisation thing a pass?
Can he play halfbackReally? The Sentinelese people are getting MRI's? Thats prime example of non colonized neolithic tribes. Have they achieved trade and cultural exchange?
View attachment 12006
A few years ago while driving home from work on the radio they had a piece on the news about an issue with China. I can't which minister it was trying to flex. It was our Ministers statement followed by the Chinese response.I watched a Xi speech where he proposed doing just that, but he called it de-colonialising. Wish we had some fluent Chinese speakers on here to tell us if the subtitles are accurate translations, and what he meant by that.
So Savant is now supporting one of the cornerstones of neo lib philosophy .... the property rights of private property owners.... the world is getting stranger and stranger by the day.Stripping democracy in front of our very eyes
Judging their own case
Yesterday National announced plans to amend the Public Works Act to "speed up" land acquisition for public works. Which sounds boring and bu...norightturn.blogspot.com
Have you driven any of the Aussie motorways down the eastern seaboard?Stripping democracy in front of our very eyes
Judging their own case
Yesterday National announced plans to amend the Public Works Act to "speed up" land acquisition for public works. Which sounds boring and bu...norightturn.blogspot.com
Yep agree on some of that. I suspect though, that "liveable" will be contentious. Liveable to me would be fantastic public transport options, huge investment in e transport and infrastructure, huge investment in rail and coastal shipping.Have you driven any of the Aussie motorways down the eastern seaboard?
Fantastic roads. A triumph of public infrastructure that couldn’t have happened if every single private landowner objected to public works
So yeah, an abuse of power is bad. But we need to move out of our third world mentality and get behind making our country more liveable and productive otherwise none of us will want to live here anymore
What's your thoughts on the proposed legislation then Mike? Given that my focus is on the removal of checks and balances.So Savant is now supporting one of the cornerstones of neo lib philosophy .... the property rights of private property owners.... the world is getting stranger and stranger by the day.
View attachment 12020
We’re actually personally involved with the current PWA because part of the shared access way we own is going to be taken for the new Redoubt Road/Mill Road project. At the stage where we’re still to be told how much of it will be required and then we’ll get told the value.What's your thoughts on the proposed legislation then Mike? Given that my focus is on the removal of checks and balances.
From your own article:Stripping democracy in front of our very eyes
Judging their own case
Yesterday National announced plans to amend the Public Works Act to "speed up" land acquisition for public works. Which sounds boring and bu...norightturn.blogspot.com
Seems that both National and Labour are getting ready to play the “Blame Game” as to who was responsible for authorizing the killing of protected wildlife, if rumours circulating through the construction industry in Wellington are to be believed.Yep agree on some of that. I suspect though, that "liveable" will be contentious. Liveable to me would be fantastic public transport options, huge investment in e transport and infrastructure, huge investment in rail and coastal shipping.
Moving away from the huge influence of the roading lobby. Note I don't say get rid of cars.
And will say again, we've had 50 years of this at least. The underlying system of that 50 years? Neoliberalism.
Must be more to it than lightly placing his hand on someone to make him flee to the HimalayasStuff
www.stuff.co.nz
Thought it was all a bit quiet regarding Andrew Bayly. Seems he’s gone off to climb Everest rather than answer questions back here surrounding his stepping down