Metcalf gets shellshocked again
Good to see you starting to get on board mate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Metcalf gets shellshocked again
He didnt have a good game. He is still learning and will only get better. He has been given the keys and has to be persevered with. Atleast he did not become invisible like some other players do as their main super power.Good to see you starting to get on board mate
Pretty tough on Metcalf.Good to see you starting to get on board mate
Reading that article you posted, it seems likely that TMM isn’t apart of the Warriors future and won’t be extended? Think the telling part is where Webster says TMM is a big part of 2025, and not TMM is a big part of our future. It reads like he isn’t even in consideration unless someone absolutely shits the bed or injury? It seems like they are keen to persist with Metcalf at 7 for whatever reason? TMM got something else lined up? Is there a 6 we think would be handy to Metcalf’s 7? I feel like Metcalf is probably in his long term role where they’d hope it works out, but I don’t feel like CHT is?Good to see you starting to get on board mate
Was Metcalf playing on the weekend? We already know that TMM goes well at 7. Metcalf has a long, long way to go to get anywhere near to the level. Hopefully he improves because that performance was dreadful. No point giving him the keys if he can't even drive yet.He didnt have a good game. He is still learning and will only get better. He has been given the keys and has to be persevered with. Atleast he did not become invisible like some other players do as their main super power.
Yup, anyone can read what they want in to the article. The most telling part is AW hasn't picked him at 7 despite what he did for us in that position last year. Plenty of people scratching their heads over it particularly after that round 1 game. That's AWs prerogative of course, but I can see pressure will continue to mount as the games go by. Also interesting that TMM is featured a fair amount in the clubs social media which you wouldn't expect if he is that far down in the clubs estimation?Reading that article you posted, it seems likely that TMM isn’t apart of the Warriors future and won’t be extended? Think the telling part is where Webster says TMM is a big part of 2025, and not TMM is a big part of our future. It reads like he isn’t even in consideration unless someone absolutely shits the bed or injury? It seems like they are keen to persist with Metcalf at 7 for whatever reason? TMM got something else lined up? Is there a 6 we think would be handy to Metcalf’s 7? I feel like Metcalf is probably in his long term role where they’d hope it works out, but I don’t feel like CHT is?
Tmm should be given another go at 7.Yup, anyone can read what they want in to the article. The most telling part is AW hasn't picked him at 7 despite what he did for us in that position last year. Plenty of people scratching their heads over it particularly after that round 1 game. That's AWs prerogative of course, but I can see pressure will continue to mount as the games go by
Not picking him at 7 is one thing, but not picking him at 6 either seems odd being the most experienced halve on the books. Then to factor in he’s off contract at the end of the season and used at fullback in a trial is looking like he’s either not viewed in the halves or not viewed in their future? Perhaps CHT’s left boot is winning him the spot at the moment at 6, but it seems like there’s a genuine persistence to continue with Metcalf at 7. I guess we’ll find out if they abort the plan if it gets dire enough, but can’t go on too long either or the season is a write off. Unless the plan is to get Metcalf accustomed to the role no matter the results?Yup, anyone can read what they want in to the article. The most telling part is AW hasn't picked him at 7 despite what he did for us in that position last year. Plenty of people scratching their heads over it particularly after that round 1 game. That's AWs prerogative of course, but I can see pressure will continue to mount as the games go by. Also interesting that TMM is featured a fair amount in the clubs social media which you wouldn't expect if he is that far down in the clubs estimation?
I think the right call was made not to play him at 6 but the wrong call not to play him at 7. It's going to be an interesting season and whether AW will break if the performance continues to be poor. Will also be interesting to see fans reactions to a second season of poor play if that does eventuate. If Metcalf is the future 7 AW needs to take some heat for not developing him as one. There has been no succession planning for the inevitable SJ retirement and now when we have TMM who has shown he can play that role available, he is instead forcing LM in to it with a learn as you go approach. Pretty poor IMO.Not picking him at 7 is one thing, but not picking him at 6 either seems odd being the most experienced halve on the books. Then to factor in he’s off contract at the end of the season and used at fullback in a trial is looking like he’s either not viewed in the halves or not viewed in their future? Perhaps CHT’s left boot is winning him the spot at the moment at 6, but it seems like there’s a genuine persistence to continue with Metcalf at 7. I guess we’ll find out if they abort the plan if it gets dire enough, but can’t go on too long either or the season is a write off. Unless the plan is to get Metcalf accustomed to the role no matter the results?
The clubs socials first and foremost are propaganda, don’t forget that.Yup, anyone can read what they want in to the article. The most telling part is AW hasn't picked him at 7 despite what he did for us in that position last year. Plenty of people scratching their heads over it particularly after that round 1 game. That's AWs prerogative of course, but I can see pressure will continue to mount as the games go by. Also interesting that TMM is featured a fair amount in the clubs social media which you wouldn't expect if he is that far down in the clubs estimation?
Indeed. Seemed to be at pains to communicate that they had made the right call with Metcalf at 7.The clubs socials first and foremost are propaganda, don’t forget that.
Notice we all start questioning Berry, nek minnit ohh he’s close as![]()
With a new halfback, youd think there could be merit in playing the most experienced guy at 6, just to be a guiding figure on the field, or perhaps they really thought Metcalf was going to hit the ground running and CHT completed him best? They were happy to play TMM 6 to SJ 7, why not play him 6 to Metcalf 7? With CNK 86 or so run metres, TMM must come into consideration at fullback if halves isn’t where he’s viewedI think the right call was made not to play him at 6 but the wrong call not to play him at 7. It's going to be an interesting season and whether AW will break if the performance continues to be poor. Will also be interesting to see fans reactions to a second season of poor play if that does eventuate.
Can’t read much into promos. Montoya was still doing them last year when he was leavingThe clubs socials first and foremost are propaganda, don’t forget that.
Notice we all start questioning Berry, nek minnit ohh he’s close as![]()
I think that's exactly what they thought in regards to LM hitting the ground running. They played TMM outside SJ while Metcalf was injured. But then they played TMM at 7 in cup with LM 6 when he returned from injury last season. Who really knows what they are thinking. Certainly was a lack of forward planning. Add in a very conservative coach and we get a team with very little spark. Hopefully they can turn things around quickly, but I have big reservations about whether they can and the next run of games arent easy. Metcalf and the rest of the team are going to have to step up big time and quickly or the Storm are going to put plenty on us in a few weeks time.With a new halfback, youd think there could be merit in playing the most experienced guy at 6, just to be a guiding figure on the field, or perhaps they really thought Metcalf was going to hit the ground running and CHT completed him best? They were happy to play TMM 6 to SJ 7, why not play him 6 to Metcalf 7? With CNK 86 or so run metres, TMM must come into consideration at fullback if halves isn’t where he’s viewed
This.No go forward from our pack which is supposedly our strength.
I think he showed enough in the trial to consider who would compliment him the best, and CHT will be around a while if he isnt replaced.With a new halfback, youd think there could be merit in playing the most experienced guy at 6, just to be a guiding figure on the field, or perhaps they really thought Metcalf was going to hit the ground running and CHT completed him best? They were happy to play TMM 6 to SJ 7, why not play him 6 to Metcalf 7? With CNK 86 or so run metres, TMM must come into consideration at fullback if halves isn’t where he’s viewed
Yeah someone nailed it when they said we are far more concerned with the appearance of success than actaully winning games.