Politics 🗳️ NZ Politics

NZWarriors.com
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
I just think the argument against colonisation is like an argument against say, the existence of a mosquito, or how the atomic bomb happened

It just is.

Yes, it could have been done better.

But at the same time, it couldn’t. Because that’s how it happened, for better or worse, for all of us to get to where we are now
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
Maori were colonisers. They colonised the Moriori and some tribes colonised others at various times.
Bit of a can of worms with this one, bit of a myth though.

A few iwi went to the Chathams and killed off most of the Moriori, who some say were an off shoot of the first Māori to get to the mainland while others say the Moriori were on the Chathams prior.

By all accounts its a combination of both.
 
I just think the argument against colonisation is like an argument against say, the existence of a mosquito, or how the atomic bomb happened

It just is.

Yes, it could have been done better.

But at the same time, it couldn’t. Because that’s how it happened, for better or worse, for all of us to get to where we are now
Is the argument about colonisation?

or the treaty and subsequent long history of it being ignored & breached?
 
Bit of a can of worms with this one, bit of a myth though.

A few iwi went to the Chathams and killed off most of the Moriori, who some say were an off shoot of the first Māori to get to the mainland while others say the Moriori were on the Chathams prior.

By all accounts its a combination of both.
Yes, but one tribe imposing themselves on another is colonisation. There are probably very few people or races or ethnicities that have never been colonised. Most races have been colonised multiple times.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
I'd say judging what you think people can choose to be or believe by the actions of long dead ancestors is a slippery slope.
Huh? Im not "going off" anything. A question was asked about co-governance and and answer was given that implied Maori have some sort of innate guardianship knowledge. I merely pointed out that doesn't appear to be the case looking at the record.
 
NZWarriors.com
Advertisement
If you would like to remove these advertisements, please do so by registering a free account
What if they only ever traded. Wouldn't that also have been a net benefit to both?
This is an interesting point of view.

Would Maori have developed without foreign capital investment and foreign economic and educational systems? We will never now but I would suggest NZ would be an isolated backwater like much of the pacific islands or Africa.

Would it have been better? All perspective but many islanders currently leave for ‘western’ countries. 170,000 Maori have left for the bright lights of Australia which is a hugely significant 20% of the Maori population. The take away for me is Maori embrace western colonised society.
 
They cant cosplay as having a special relationship of conservation. Would you say thats fair?
Have always found this a little ironic and a bit if revisionist history. Fits much better into todays values but an afterthought in Hunter gatherer survival.
Haast Eagle extinct due to over hunting of Moa, Tuatara hunted to extinction on mainlands, numerous other species along with massive areas of forest burnt to clear for crops and hunting doesn’t paint a conservationist picture
 
Back
Top