Who mentioned Africa?
Yet we justify it all the time. Capital punishment, wars etc
So your thesis is a slow painful death for a lot more people is preferable?
You don't seem to read what I have said to well.
To your first point about Africa, growing up in NZ during the famines I had to listen to a lot of Pakeha say why don't we just bomb them to get rid of the problem. This is a thing, ignorant white folks ringing up talk back and saying lets just bomb them (any non white race, they never offer a genocide solution in Europe....work that one out)
Your second point about Capital punishment is gas lighting somewhat since what I said was in reply to a comment that genocide is logical.
As a believer in Capital punishment based off my work with Pedos and other fkwits you cannot gas light me about international murder by decree with War.
I know for a fact that you as ex Military understand there are rules. And Genocide as a solution (which Wiz was offering) is not fucking part of the rules of engagement in any international court.
You may have stepped outside those boundaries, I am not judging that, however as someone who was also bound by the Geneva convention in the treatment of Prisoners I will not be gas lit about a soft genocide argument on any level in any forum or any discourse.
Read this clearly aloud in your Mirror "GENOCIDE SHOULD NEVER ENTER THE THINKING OF ANYONE CLAIMING TO BE A MEMBER OF THE HUMAN RACE.
Genocide is what apes do. Dumb fucking monkeys like some of clowns posting in here.
Take another read of the Hitler youth idiot Wiz and his genocide solution....
If Palestine/ Israel has been going on for 2000 years and there will never be a solution… is it better to genocide a few people now and create one happy countries rather than more people dying in wars going on for the next 2000 years?
Cold hard logic?
Not saying I support it but is that what the logic tells us? What the US has chosen?