Good call seems like all you have todo is have a good season in 20s then ta-da your in first grade
We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
I see what you're saying about most those players Warriorworkhorse, but I don't know how much of Tuimavave you've seen. If you can recall the games he played for us later in the season, he was our only positive in most those games. I think he let through a try in his first game, but other than that impressed all with his attack.
Just because someone hasn't had many oppurtunities, doesn't make them no hopers. Especially when we already have such a young squad.
this is something ME spoke about preseason. He wants players to through reserve grade and be challanged against men not boys.The reason the Oz teams have good youngsters is they don't have a love affair with the Under 20's comp. Anyone half decent gets pushed to reserve grade
this is something ME spoke about preseason. He wants players to through reserve grade and be challanged against men not boys.
I 100% agree. I think the club got caught up in thinking seeing we are winning silverware that the players are that good and can transition.That's how it should be, the 20s boys need to play men and get a real taste ov hard hitting football. A lot ov them think the transition will be easy but in fact as we can see with our young boys they can't handle other then hurrell.
this is something ME spoke about preseason. He wants players to through reserve grade and be challanged against men not boys.
sounds spot on, and when we did have alot of boys coming up through the vulcans or dropping from the top side to the vulcans , they also made the grand final in 2011
didnt seem to work aswell last season, be great to see a vulcans team chock full of the boys who can no longer play 20's and the ones who are on the cusp of first grade
The whole U20's comp needs to go! Banished back to it's rightful place as park footy! Bring back reserve grade as the 2nd tier comp, half the names mentioned here wouldn't have even made it to the 'needs to go' stage, at least not this early in their careers.
I would have thought, if the NRL wanted to implement a reserve grade comp to replace the U20's then clubs would be adequately funded with the new tv deal? the U20's get prime time tv coverage and we're watching absolute shyte! it's done nothing to benefit the game and it's taken a lot away, it doesn't even resemble a first grade NRL match or even a pathway to 1st grade imo, they could have the same tv slot, with higher profile players, strategies, and an actual gameplan for a the curtain raiser.I agree but a 20s side is a lot cheaper for a club to fund than a reserve grade side. The QRL would be dead against it as well cos it would dilute the QCup.
great postI disagree. I think the U20s is a good comp, just not the only comp we need. I don't feel NSW Cup is right either. I would like to see both a genuine reserve grade in conjunction with U20s.
I disagree with virtually all of the players mentioned by the first poster.
In my opinion, the only people who should be concerned right now would be Steve Raps, Ropo and perhaps Billy T.
I don't believe any of the 2011 U20s mentioned have been given enough time to decide whether they are ready or not. The way Bluey used the entire team was a joke, so how could any of these young guys be expected to perform to top level. Sam Lousi, Carlos and Ikahihifo all showed genuine ability that just needs coaching to turn to top quality.
Sam Lousi will never be a "crash over everyone" type of player. I see him as being something along the lines of Mateo - an offload wizard who will stand in every tackle and draw 3 or 4 defenders every time. Just like Mateo, it will always be difficult to get good minutes out of him.
I think Carlos actually showed up Johnson in his few games. I always considered Carlos a bit flighty in U20s, but he showed real maturity while playing an unfamiliar (though not totally) role in first grade. Johnson was the disappointment. He faded in and out of games constantly while Carlos gave his all in a shambolic squad. I believe Carlos will be an important part of the team within a year or 2.
Sione Lousi, while not a true first grader is very good prop depth and is a far better option than Ukuma was. I was not a big fan of Sione prior to this season, but when he stepped in at prop this year, he showed a lot more than he has ever done in the past.
Ropo, as was said by someone earlier, is only standing in the way of developing players who will be far better players than he ever was. Regardless of injury, I hope he steps aside this year.
Steve Rapira is nothing but a myth. Everyone talks about the mongrel he brings to the team. I never saw any while in a Warriors jersey. He has achieved nothing while here, and is even a waste as a Vulcan. I looked forward to seeing him and Sam take the field, but am over that idea. Sam can go too, if he can't produce a full season.
I am living in hope that a new coach will inspire Billy to lift above the mediocre and have a genuine good season, instead of his imaginary good season of 2012.
Apart from the above, I think the whole Bluey experiment should be treated as a coaching gamble that failed epically. The players should get another chance to show what they have.
The reason the Oz teams have good youngsters is they don't have a love affair with the Under 20's comp. Anyone half decent gets pushed to reserve grade
Since you didn't quote anyone I'm just gonna assume you are referring to most of the posters in this thread. If you were 'talking' to just person in particular, then please disregard this post. I won't speak for everyone, but I genuinely believe that releasing certain players would be good for both parties.Wow, this was a thread that should've been put to bed before it began. To have a crack at Tuimavave and Vatuvei is laughable at best, one stepped up and shone in a hiding to nothing situation with an inexperienced stand in Coach, the other gets a start on the back of his history alone. Short memories these 'fans', very short memories. My advice, last year was what is was, suck it up and spend your energy supporting the boys rather than throwing darts, or go join the Eels brigade, you'll fit right in. Cheers.
Since you didn't quote anyone I'm just gonna assume you are referring to most of the posters in this thread. If you were 'talking' to just person in particular, then please disregard this post. I won't speak for everyone, but I genuinely believe that releasing certain players would be good for both parties.
Unless we are absolutely decimated by injuries, I can't see how keeping both Benry and Taylor would benefit the Warriors or the two players. They can both do better elsewhere and it would be a waste of their talent and dedication to training if they were just used as depth, waiting in the Vulcans for an injury.
Rapira jnr isn't doing so well here. When we got him back from the cowboys, only to be used as depth, their fans were livid that we had squandered his potential(exaggeration alert). This leads me to believe he might go well elsewhere.
Whilst I like Tupou, you don't see players of his (current) calibre in Champion teams. I'd only rehire him if he drastically improves or we can't find anyone better.
As for Carlos, I would absolutely hate to see him in a different team. If we don't resign him, I will cry a little.
I'll admit I'm a Vatuvei "hater" who believes he is no longer at the NRL standard. I am fully aware of what he has done for the club but, like you say, that's history.
To paraphrase Two-Face from the Dark Knight movie (the one with Joker), "You either retire a great player or play long enough to see yourself become mud". Vatuvei, at least in my eyes, has entered the mud phase.
Wouldn't sub-mud mean not as muddy as normal mud?Tupou aspires to reach the heights of the mud phase... the mud phase would be a career high for Billy.
I think he is sub-mud.
Wouldn't sub-mud mean not as muddy as normal mud?
Still... the fact we are talking about which winger is more mud says a lot about our sad situation.