We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
I am going to have to pass on this club..Duly noted. While your application has been made in the wrong place and attention to detail is crucial in the role of Kata Fan Club membership admin, I am willing to still accept your expression of interest. I cannot, however, overlook the fact that you are clearly over qualified for the role. Perhaps Vice President may be a more suitable fit for a person of your undoubted intelligence and capacity for rational thought.
I was kinda relieved he didn't overplay his new hand there, and that he just gassed it at a wide open line.Kata was strong today.
But did Fusitua score any tries?
Kata’s second maybe could have drawn his man and fed my boy a try to share the love.
85.71% to be preciseA lot was written about the goal kicking over the off season. Another hole left by Johnson.
I know the trials showed Keighran was capable but I was thinking there would be nerves stepping up to first grade so as long as he gets most of them and builds up by the time the finals come around.
After today what the F do I know. He kicked well.
I think he has it over Burr, not saying Burr is no good, just that Papaili is very good.big call
I think it is simple, the rule is there for safety, so who gives a feck if the player is attacking or defending. Sometimes these NRL types amaze me.Whats everybodys thoughts on the attacker being able to be tackled in the air?? I've never liked the rule myself.
Heyzeuss spare me Mr. Brownstone, a million dollars?In fact Kata at right centre looked a million dollars
I was watching the players faces after they scored and looking at the people behind them. I dunno what it is but i reckon i read people pretty well. There was a lot of honest joy when someone scored, well beyond what I have seen in other years. I think because it was so many different players and that there would have been a lot of unknown even for the team, maybe a bit of relief as well. But their eyes shone and I dont think there was any resentment out there at all.I was kinda relieved he didn't overplay his new hand there, and that he just gassed it at a wide open line.
Made the kick an easier shot too I spose.
If I'm being picky rather than thump his chest at the Telly when Fusitua tipped the ball inside to him, it would have been nice to see him just run straight for the player that created that Try his wingman, still it was excellent support play by Kata.
This is still my favourite comment of the night.I think it’s time we declared and let the Doggies have a bat.
Tom got owned last night. His team are specials for the spoon IMO after Parra. The difference was chalk n cheese. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is all class.Ask Phil Rothfield. He'll say Tom Trbojevic for one as he plays on the wing for Australia. I'll give you a minute to let that sink in for a bit.
Jokes aside it was good to see him involved in the attack a lot more instead of being spent doing early set hit ups coming out of our end.
Dumb rule. They 're missing the point. Doesn't matter if the attacker has momentum. He can still be dragged off centre and land on his neck or head or spine.Whats everybodys thoughts on the attacker being able to be tackled in the air?? I've never liked the rule myself.
I understand the rule is likely due to the attacker having the momentum running onto the ball, so how else it a flat footed defender supposed to have a fair shot at it(thats the only reason I can think of why it would make sense).
It was good to see Kearney address it, and say he was going to raise the issue with the NRL. I'm not sure the answer to the solution, but hes completely right they always look so awkward and dangerous. It's only a matter of time before someone lands on their neck.
Tom didn't play.Tom got owned last night. His team are specials for the spoon IMO after Parra. The difference was chalk n cheese. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck is all class.
But he'll still get named in the NRL team of the roundTom didn't play.
Am I getting mixed up with Jake again?Tom didn't play.
Was thinking the same thing. I think my question about the reason why the centers switched was answered. It wasn't because his passing is better left to right. The 2 passes I recall from him to Fusitua were awkward 2-handers. I think it was because Ken was tired of not getting the ball. Not saying that Hiku was feeding Ken a lot. Just noting there is no other real reason.Kata was strong today.
But did Fusitua score any tries?
Kata’s second maybe could have drawn his man and fed my boy a try to share the love.
Was thinking the same thing. I think my question about the reason why the centers switched was answered. It wasn't because his passing is better left to right. The 2 passes I recall from him to Fusitua were awkward 2-handers. I think it was because Ken was tired of not getting the ball. Not saying that Hiku was feeding Ken a lot. Just noting there is no other real reason.
Fusitua not getting a try could be a bad thing. Might indicate that Kata is hogging opportunities. Thing is, Fusitua used to be a sure thing for try, does that mean Kata is draining our point scoring? Cos I guarantee Kata ain't going to make up the 20 odd tries Fusitua got.
Is this SK transitioning Fusitua to centre and Kata to wing? Fusitua could be as good or better than Toopi.