SK. The debate of the hour.
I've been in support of
SK...more so the cause.
A coach who has a plan. A long term plan and vision for this team.
We haven't had that since...Ivan.
SK has a bad NRL coaching record.
In the last 5 seasons the Warriors have had a poor coach track record.
They have a fanbase who have grown inpatient. In a country that doesn't tolerate losers.
With Australia media who love to poke fun at a struggling outcast team.
And their own NZ union-biased media who love pushing the blue chip league into irrelevance.
But throughout all the bullshit. The demeanor of
SK has remained the same.
"Process".
Consistency does start from the top. Doyle has cleaned up HQ.
As others have said, that don't mean shit if on field results don't improve.
But if
SK persists. If that facet can remain constant unlike it has in seasons past....
We have to hold onto some form of hope.
As for the now...players need to be held accountable.
The Thompsons, Hoffmans...
Katas....
It's time to reward the Sipleys, Papali'is...
Time to back the
Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad's,
Afoa's...
The only criticism of
SK for me is sticking with the experienced heads too long.
I get the notion of picking a consistent team.
But if the same players are consistently dropping the ball, then we are going to consistently get shit results.
Which is what we've been faced with.
Which is why we are fed up.
Which is why
SK needs to show the balls he had in the Kiwis, to drop the players like The Marshall's, the JWH's...
I mean he punished Vete. He punished Lolohea.
One is playing for his career. The other is already out the door.
He dropped
Maumalo but thanks to injury he found his way back into First grade.
We've seen 2 of his better games in first grade as a result.
The axe must be weld this week...it has to be.
Season depends on it.
SK's credibility depends on it.