Good on
Kearney for declaring he didn't want to be a puppet coach with the Kiwis and Bennett in 2008.
He has sat back quietly for a very long time before being validated by Bennett on his 2008 achievement.
Lots to learn from that interview, while a bunch of it is generic and cliche, there are some really interesting insights into how both men think and how their opinions are relevant to the Warriors / Kiwis situation.
The Warriors have been reliant on internal development possibly more than the other fifteen teams by virtue of being the least attractive club for Aussie based players to sign with.
Bennett talks about how players at the same level don't have anything to offer one another in terms of collaboration (he cites the under twenties and the lessons learned as an example.
This has to be telling from a Warrior point of view more than other clubs.
Kearney makes two main points about his personal input as a head coach.
He is somewhat obsessed with establishing the culture of the team and choosing players with what he calls energy ahead of talent.
He defines energy as positivity.
The culture thing is specifically used to be inclusive.
Kotahi Tanga.
The one nation stuff.
Putting an Asian element into the Haka to include
Johnson is unprecedented, as Is the idea of P.I. and Pakeha elements.
I was not a fan of The Iwi Kiwi the kiwi haka till I listened to
Kearney's philosophy. As an inclusive element in bringing people together it satisfies my critical bone.....till he explained it....to me it was a sell out of Maori culture.
All that aside, it is interesting to hear
Kearney declare his hand about talent versus what he calls the energy that people bring.
He owned the unpopular decisions he has made and has made it Clear that people like Marshall and JWH missed out based on ego.
He referenced Bennett as a prophet in the no ego approach to selection
The idea being.....that declaration that all players are equal....which means you have a format that lifts your debutants to their full potential.
The example he gives of the excersise where four defenders play against six attackers......sees
Kearney's natural personality revealed, he uses words like why the bloody hell would they do that ?....that's the Stephen
Kearney the players know....down to earth....and approachable ( he cites a players vision of a game which is different to a coaches....while coaches will see a situation in an analytic sense, players will look at the same dynamics and talk about opportunity).
At that point of the interview I see why
Kearney is so successful.
He can hear what a player sees with an ex players eyes.
He can identify when a player has been restricted by a coaches Mantra around completion.
If players can't express themselves and play what is in front of them in a training drill, then questions need to be asked of the coaching structures.
I'm sure Wayne Bennett would have been interested in that example
Kearney used....he was after all one of our greatest second phase forwards of the modern era.