
Sup42
Contributor
The Kumuls are always my Fav underdog , the way they use every tackle as an opportunity to test their Warriorness ( is that a word....no but it'll do ) against the big names warms the heart.I read an article the other day from a UK paper. The writer was commenting on Samoa's submission of 26 players on their roster instead of 24, whether it was a mistake or the Samoan team meant to do that. He went to on to say (in so many words) why not? Why can't the "smaller" nations have more players available at the tournament, I completely agree. In my opinion the world cup is a show piece for rugby league to encourage greater participation in the sport itself. I think the comp can be a bit more flexible as long as everyone agrees to it, regarding registrations and player numbers and so forth. I thought about which nation needs to win it the most. England - their local comp could use a win, NZ - could definitely use a win, Australia - yeah they always need a win. To keep the NRL pumping, competitive with the AFL and now soccer. The NRL is important to all competing nations really. Samoa - definitely need a win for their local comp. Tonga, same. So all competing nations to some degree really need to win, its hard to find an outstanding under dog amongst this lot. I'm most definitely going to cheer for the Kiwis - but being the underdog supporter I wont be too disappoint if Samoa wins, or even Tonga, or dare I say it - England. I hope NZRL go nuts marketing the marketable image of Sonny Bill. I hope all clubs jump on the marketing band wagon and promote, promote, promote the sport - that's the whole point of it really.
They remind me of the Kiwis when there were no names / non professional players in the team playing the Lions and the Aussies.
The other reason I'd love to see the Kumuls do well is they are the Rugby league nation.