We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
| ||
---|---|---|
Warriors | Vs | Sharks |
18 | Cbus Super Stadium 07 Aug 2021 17:00 81st minute | 16 |
Hands down my favourite moment in the gameI thought my love for Aitken was at an all time high when he scored the try.... then he winked at Chambers. Love that man
He told Chambers to stop talking shit.Can Anyone re watching the replay tell me what Kane said before he was called out and sent off the first time, I think it was jazz trying to calm him down and Kane said something like I'm sick of this shit.
OK thanksRead how the base/similar/non similar loadings and discounts/pleas work.
![]()
Round 21 charges: DWZ, Napa, Hetherington banned
All the official charges from the match review committee for round 21 of the Telstra Premiership.www.nrl.com
If lodge had taken a guilty plea and had a clean record for past 2 years he would not have missed a match.
It was a perfect strip. The arm that Fifita was holding the ball in never touched the ground and the other 2 warriors had dropped off the tackle just before Chanel Harris-Tavita stripped it.As bad as Cecchin was I appreciate him letting Chanel Harris-Tavita away with a strip whilst Fifita had a hand & both knees on the ground. Huge play in the context of the game
As a stone cold fanboy as a kid I approve this messageFor all you doubters, I’ve got one phrase for you:
LODGE 3:16
I would like to know also based off how he reacted.Lots of press coming out about what Chambers actually said, without actually saying what was said.
Isaac luke deleted a tweet saying chamber's own team didn't approve.
Have to wonder what was said
There is an article on the Australian which quotes Cameron George saying ...I would like to know also based off how he reacted.
Have seen it claimed else where it was a ‘homophobic slur’ but havent seen it substantiated
He conveniently left those stats out.
![]()
I agree it’s unfair, but an argument that “that guy did something worse and went unpunished “ is not going to get Lodge off, he’s going to have to prove what he did was not accidental.Although Chambers may have crossed a line but so did Evans, anybody who has played either code knows it generally the one who retaliates that cops it.
I have a real issue with Lodge's charge, using the word careless means that the contact was accidental but could have been avoided if care was taken. Then we have the Shark's players deliberately doing no arm tacklesm which are outlawed because of risk of injury.
So we have a player charged for accidental contact while other players intentionally break the tackle rules with no sanction, I would contest the charge on that alone and back it up with video evidence.
I may be completely way off. But wasn't Evans with Hayne, when he had his infamous night out??Lots of press coming out about what Chambers actually said, without actually saying what was said.
Isaac luke deleted a tweet saying chamber's own team didn't approve.
Have to wonder what was said
I don't know if any one else has already answered your post J_P, but the NRL email address is Feedback@nrl.com.auWhat's the email address. I'll oblige. I've only started following warriors closely the last few years but the officiating in nrl is embarrassingly bad, not just against the warriors.
“Supporter Liaison”, Why even bother. Someone in their sweat pants working from home.I don't know if any one else has already answered your post J_P, but the NRL email address is Feedback@nrl.com.au
I have written a few times and some of the responses are:
The NRL is a business and as such it would be foolish of us to favour any teams over others. Our aim is to see the game grow and prosper and each of our 16 clubs play an important part in that plan.
Let me also assure you that I do not think there is a question of bias in any of this. We are entirely confident the overwhelming majority of our clubs, players and officials would never act to compromise the integrity of our sport.
There are always going to be subjective calls that are made in Rugby League but be assured referees make them on the basis of the facts as they see them not on the basis of who the team is. You are perfectly entitled to disagree with certain refereeing decisions but it is wrong to suggest that their decisions would be influenced by any consideration other than what they thought was the appropriate ruling at the time.
Please be assured that there is no bias against any teams. Our aim is to see the game grow and prosper and each of our 16 clubs play an important part in that plan.
Thanks again for taking the time to write to us, we’ll ensure your views are registered.
Kind regards
(Name)
Supporter Liaison
Probably artificial intelligence response.“Supporter Liaison”, Why even bother. Someone in their sweat pants working from home.
Your kidding yourself, it would make no difference whatsoever. You’d have more luck collectively smashing their Social media account than emailing that address.Probably artificial intelligence response.
But
if 1152 of us e mailed this address which I have a report woudl land somewhere and they might go fark we better re look at this.
Sack Annersley and appoint some other cant.
Yeap got the e-mail address and went them an email. That response is about what i expected.I don't know if any one else has already answered your post J_P, but the NRL email address is Feedback@nrl.com.au
I have written a few times and some of the responses are:
The NRL is a business and as such it would be foolish of us to favour any teams over others. Our aim is to see the game grow and prosper and each of our 16 clubs play an important part in that plan.
Let me also assure you that I do not think there is a question of bias in any of this. We are entirely confident the overwhelming majority of our clubs, players and officials would never act to compromise the integrity of our sport.
There are always going to be subjective calls that are made in Rugby League but be assured referees make them on the basis of the facts as they see them not on the basis of who the team is. You are perfectly entitled to disagree with certain refereeing decisions but it is wrong to suggest that their decisions would be influenced by any consideration other than what they thought was the appropriate ruling at the time.
Please be assured that there is no bias against any teams. Our aim is to see the game grow and prosper and each of our 16 clubs play an important part in that plan.
Thanks again for taking the time to write to us, we’ll ensure your views are registered.
Kind regards
(Name)
Supporter Liaison
08 May
Compiled from 13 ratings