
snake77
There might have been an eliminate or risk or investment in his potential with how much we may have paid for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. But it looks like we gambled on his potential and we came up with a winner.
I prefer a fullback who on kick returns their first instinct is to run direct as it helps with the rest of the team returning on side. Our outside backs were making a lot of yardage on early sets in 2014 when we were going quite well and that was without the fullback really contributing in that area.
The more this season goes and the more he improves the more I'm going back to the original thinking when we signed Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Luke. We should improve a lot it's a matter of the others lifting with the extra class around them. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck gives us a good support runner, he can link out wide like Tomkins, Luke will hope us around the park and our go forward.
I prefer a fullback who on kick returns their first instinct is to run direct as it helps with the rest of the team returning on side. Our outside backs were making a lot of yardage on early sets in 2014 when we were going quite well and that was without the fullback really contributing in that area.
The more this season goes and the more he improves the more I'm going back to the original thinking when we signed Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Luke. We should improve a lot it's a matter of the others lifting with the extra class around them. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck gives us a good support runner, he can link out wide like Tomkins, Luke will hope us around the park and our go forward.