We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
I don't really see it as Benji's job to talk us up.
I've seen him talk other clubs up. That wasn't his own. If he successfully managed to help Locke rangle his way out of his contract. You'd have no ill feelings about Benji's plan to sign him up to someone else? Because as a Warriors fan, i'd be mad as hell. If we had've lost Locke down to Benji's influence.
I struggle to see how Benji could have that sort of influence really.
Locke, not Johnson.Benji wasn't trying to sign Johnson to another club, but to another agent. Benji can't be expected to know Johnson's contractual agreements with his agent. That the other agent then tried to shop him around to other clubs for 2013 while Johnson was already contracted to the Warriors falls on the agent (and, to a lesser degree, Johnson) - but Benji can't be blamed for that.
Benji wasn't trying to sign Johnson to another club, but to another agent. Benji can't be expected to know Johnson's contractual agreements with his agent. That the other agent then tried to shop him around to other clubs for 2013 while Johnson was already contracted to the Warriors falls on the agent (and, to a lesser degree, Johnson) - but Benji can't be blamed for that.
But it states in the article that Benji did get him to sign the contract but someone stepped in. Obviously legal issues got involved and voided it. But the influence was obviously there because there was another contract signed.
Are you saying Benji would've had no idea after to speaking to Locke about signing another contract, about Locke's 2 year deal extension with the Warriors. Surely you don't believe that, i've never taken you as niave, JB.
You agree that we're talking about a player agent contract, and not a playing/club contract, correct?
With the intention of shopping him around elsewhere while currently contracted. Yes.
How many other players does tauber have on his books? They couldn't be the "link man"??
An agents job is to get the most for their clients. I fail to see where benji fits into all this.
Benji was the link between said parties.
"Tauber’s main client Benji Marshall got in Locke’s ear on the Four Nations tour of England last year and
then signed him to a contract when he returned home."
The new contract owners intention to sell him to the Roosters for 2013. As stated below.
"To the Warriors’ amazement, Tauber started shopping Locke around for 2013 and got a major bite from the Roosters."
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226268808934
Surely you didn't miss the press release last season. Locke signed a two year extension. What did you think i was upset about?
Kevin Locke onboard with Warriors till 2013
Zero Tackle
– June 19, 2011
The New Zealand Warriors announced today that rising star Kevin Locke has signed a contract at the club until the end of the 2013 season.
After turning on a number of star performances at fullback, the Warriors worked with his agent to contract Locke for an additional year.
Warriors CEO Wayne Scurrah argues that it was never in doubt that Locke would be in Auckland beyond 2011 despite rumours the Rabbitohs had been eager to snare him.
But Locke admits, after taking his footy career for granted, he realised this year there was every chance the club he loves might cut him loose.
As a fan of Locke i don't want him to leave, i don't think we have options as strong as him yet. Even if a few have potential. Something shady obviously occured, other wise it wouldn't have been noted in the paper. Benji was the link man. What have i stated that is otherwise?
Sorry seb, but you'll have to be more specific. How do you back up the assertion that Benji Marshall willingly and knowingly encouraged Kevin Locke to sign for a club other than the Warriors while he (Locke) was still contracted to our club?
That's an assertion that I can't see any backing for.
The only facts (if the story is corroborated, of course) are:
A) Benji convinced Locke to get a different player manager.
B) Locke signed a contract with a new player manager.
C) The manager deceitfully tried to offer Locke to other clubs, most notably the Roosters, while Locke was contracted to the Warriors.
How do you assign the blame for C to Benji Marshall, when he wasn't even involved in shopping Locke around to other clubs? Sure, we can all assert our way to fill in the gaps by suggesting that Benji told Tauber to shop Locke around, or that Benji convinced Locke to sign with Tauber while knowing in advance that Tauber would try to make Locke break his contract with the Warriors, but where's the backing for that assertion?
12 May
Compiled from 8 ratings