ToiletDuck
Administrator
Vancent
🫣
Contributor
tajhay
🏉
The gameday thread will soon have live scores, live player stats of both teams and team lineups.
mt.wellington
Warriors Orange Peeler
Contributor
Lets hope it doesnt create any lag like the live feeds from a couple seasons ago...
drunk_monk
Contributor
Re the Forum Etiquette thread the quote "or brings a poster or the forum into disrepute." was both funny but concerning.
Noting how the NRL judiciary has governed what constitutes bringing the game into disrepute and how much it swings from player to player, I am wondering if the NZWarriors.com judiciary will also use such a poor disciplinary system with no consistency.
Noting how the NRL judiciary has governed what constitutes bringing the game into disrepute and how much it swings from player to player, I am wondering if the NZWarriors.com judiciary will also use such a poor disciplinary system with no consistency.
drunk_monk
Contributor
Lord Gnome of Howick MBE
mt.wellington
Warriors Orange Peeler
Contributor
Gizzyfan
Can questions be put to the club admin through the site to chosen by the Mods.?
It seems a simple email exchange and with the mods can be kept respectful and reasonably inside the bounds of sanity. (It is the Warriors)
It seems a simple email exchange and with the mods can be kept respectful and reasonably inside the bounds of sanity. (It is the Warriors)
mt.wellington
Warriors Orange Peeler
Contributor
There have been numerous attempts to set something up like this over the years. Even gone so far as to set up threads asking members for questions. tajhay is the best to answer this one and why things havent progressed as planned...
Lord Gnome of Howick MBE
Thanks.
I am also following Steve Matai but he's gone a bit quiet - maybe mislaid his iPhone?
Gizzyfan
Maybe he is getting it fixed.
drunk_monk
Contributor
Question about the offending posts in the rules thread.
Is saying *insert ref or judicial figure or group like the judiciary* is a bias dick weed considered one of risk? because we all love a good vent and with the wild inconsistencies its not hard to draw a line of bias, whether true or not.
I know saying x person does x substance would be a risk or x person did x unethical action without it at least being in the news is a risk but not sure about the above.
Is saying *insert ref or judicial figure or group like the judiciary* is a bias dick weed considered one of risk? because we all love a good vent and with the wild inconsistencies its not hard to draw a line of bias, whether true or not.
I know saying x person does x substance would be a risk or x person did x unethical action without it at least being in the news is a risk but not sure about the above.
gREVUS
Long live the Rainbows and Butterflies
Contributor
not an admin but would imagine it comes under the rules of factuallity. If the person as named is in fact a biased dick weed then there would be no problems. However you would probably have to back up your comment of bias with factual proof. Most people being scrutinized by fandom are automatically dick weeds that i really dont see a problem with this part.
Miket12
gREVUS
Long live the Rainbows and Butterflies
Contributor
damn cant funny and like, maybe the admins can fix that for megREVUS Fixed that for you
mrblonde
Hi folks.
Done forgot how to change signature....Please remind this poor simple fool how it's done?
Cheers.
Done forgot how to change signature....Please remind this poor simple fool how it's done?
Cheers.
