I think this goes a bit beyond the Panthers discussion to be honest. I saw the transcript for this discussion from NRL 360 and the bit that got me was this quote.
" in past years referees have been graded after each game. And within that it’s regarded that a close penalty count is good refereeing, whereas a lopsided penalty count was regarded as poor refereeing "
read whole thing here
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...r/news-story/adea08e29fdc62b82532a8845030dbeb
Now my biggest issue with the refs in the NRL is not the bias its the training they do to predict the way the game will go. And this square up shit is more of the same. managing games is influencing results. This has to affect the betting market, it sure as hell affects the overall results in the for and against, so how is this not blatantly rigging the comp.
To claim that its stopped this year seems simplistic to what has been an endemic problem for years now.
"Kent: No my point is this, if it’s happening subconsciously it could still be happening. It happened for the last five years ago under a different administration.
Ikin: You can subconsciously manage a team back into the game?
Kent: No you can!
Ikin: Manage a team? You can’t award penalties on purpose to get a team back in the game by accident.
Hooper: 100 per cent
Buzz: But there have been square ups over the years and I heard you say on radio that there was a code word they use.
Hooper: That was years ago.
Buzz: How do you know it was years ago.