
jonesy101
Every single one of those players you've quoted are signed for next season too so bag packing they are not.
Last edited:
We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
|
minute |
|
01 Jan 1970 12:00 PM |
Tries | ||
/ | Conversions | / |
/ | Field Goals | / |
/ | Two Point Field Goals | / |
% | Posession | % |
/ | Set Completion | / |
Completion Rate | ||
Time in Opposition Half | ||
Metres Gained | ||
Dropouts | ||
Dummy Half Runs | ||
Kicks | ||
Kick Metres | ||
40/20 | ||
20/40 | ||
One on One Strip | ||
Line Breaks | ||
Offloads |
Penalties (Conceded) | ||
Set Restarts | ||
Errors | ||
Handling Errors | ||
Missed Tackles | ||
Sin Bin | ||
Sent Off |
# | Player | T | Pts | TA | LB | TB | OFF | Ta | MT | IT | Pos | DR | K | KM | M | E | P |
---|
# | Player | T | Pts | TA | LB | TB | OFF | Ta | MT | IT | Pos | DR | K | KM | M | E | P |
---|
Every single one of those players you've quoted are signed for next season too so bag packing they are not.
As it was play on there would have been no chance of a challengeWow that is penalty try territory. If only Roger didn’t constantly piss the challenges away.
To give context to the mistakes, we defended the whole game. Harris 58 tackles; Lawton 45; Jazz stat padding out 42. Another 4 players with 30+ tackes. We did significantly more work than the Panthers players: total tackles - 440 vs 318. 120 extra tackles, that’s 20 extra sets of 6! And the stats don’t say that we were putting effort into our tackles and hitting hard. Rushing out and closing down their options. The 1%ers off the ball that also take energy.To those abusing players for mistakes made. These guys are human, mistakes are going to be made. There are two kinds of mistakes, effort mistakes, which means the guy is trying, the other is careless mistakes. I don't think any player could be accused of a lack of effort.
Thought at the time the third ref would look at it and he would be sent off. Definitely deliberate. You don’t accidentally step on someone like that. Another thing just ignored.Pretty ordinary and in my opinion intentional if not reckless from Luai. I'm hoping that if one of the players saw this at the time, they would of had the balls to confront Luai and make a deal about it. It would have been given way more coverage than the 1 replay that was shown and would have likely earned us penalty, rather than forcing another drop out.
I don't think it was deliberate. The foot stomp.Thought at the time the third ref would look at it and he would be sent off. Definitely deliberate. You don’t accidentally step on someone like that. Another thing just ignored.
It was assault - worse than the racial abuse on the sidelines.
Point taken Wrighty, but Luai steps to the side of Kodi and as you say "shortens his stride." Why would he shorten his stride for any reason other than to deliberately step on Kodi's head? Luai could have continued to step around Kodi and avoid Kodi all together. He wasn't in contention for chasing down the kick through. I could understand the argument if there was some urgency in Luai trying to get to the ball and in doing so accidentally stepped on Kodi's head, but he was no where near the ball and had no urgency in getting to it.I don't think it was deliberate. The foot stomp.
It just happened.
He had to put his foot somewhere, and yes he shortened his stride and his foot ended up stomping kodi, but he did that foot placement on auto pilot. If he put his foot anywhere else, with kodi in his way he would have twisted his foot and landed awkwardly. Are you with me? Do you see where I am coming from or is my point unclear.
Thanks for posting. That single frame pretty much confirms that Hiku instinctively saw the situation which is why he went down the short side. Commentators were wrong for saying it was a mistake in him doing that. All academic now but is that a professional foul as it was the only thing stopping I think was Papa from catching the ball to score a try?
Because if he hadn't have shortened his stride his heel would have partially clipped Kodis head and Jerome would have ended up landing awkwardly and rolling his ankle possibly spraining it.Point taken Wrighty, but Luai steps to the side of Kodi and as you say "shortens his stride." Why would he shorten his stride for any reason other than to deliberately step on Kodi's head? Luai could have continued to step around Kodi and avoid Kodi all together. He wasn't in contention for chasing down the kick through. I could understand the argument if there was some urgency in Luai trying to get to the ball and in doing so accidentally stepped on Kodi's head, but he was no where near the ball and had no urgency in getting to it.
12 May
Compiled from 8 ratings