couldnt agree more. as much as i hate fifita, if it didnt go up as try i wouldnt have given it, i saw a little seperation but because it went up try there definitely wasnt enough evidence to call no trySorry but not only was that grounded, you can't overturn it. I've been saying this for three years - the system is pathetic - get rid of it.
The only logical decision that could have been made was either offside (which they didn't seem to interested to check) if that's ok it was a certain try...but if they somehow decide that it wasn't a try it had to be a penalty try for the early tackle..And if he was taken out with the ball right by his hands then it has to be a penalty try surely
i hate the indecision of the nrl refs and video refs. make the right decision let teams live with the consequence. they dont want to be seen as making a decision that decides the game.And if he was taken out with the ball right by his hands then it has to be a penalty try surely
With the talk of some of the more powerful clubs wanting more power from the NRL you could be right. We could be in for an N.W.O takeover.Has eric bischoff been contracted to write scripts for the nrl games. Absolute enthralling match between raiders and sharks. I swear refs get cues to give penalties at different times to create drama in the game. Insane game.
Its seems like it, sometimes in terms of "what a comeback!!!" and sometimes "i cant believe the ref made that decision" its like the refs give a delayed 3 count lol just to drag the match out and create drama lolWith the talk of some of the more powerful clubs wanting more power from the NRL you could be right. We could be in for an N.W.O takeover.
Looking at how tight the competition ladder is; it looks like something that would be scripted to maximise drama.
At the very least it should have been a penalty try. Refs have no balls these days...