
We get it. Ads aren't what you are here for. NZWarriors.com has been up for almost 20 years and relies on ad revenue to help keep the server running.
Please add us to your ad blocker's whitelist or disable to run on our website. Alternatively, click here to upgrade your account to remove all ads.
They will be worried about a copy cat.Have to feel for the victims obviously. But also the people there who managed to escape as they were there doing their weekly shop.
Then there is the staff. They have a hard enough job at the moment as it is working as an essential worker during a covid outbreak. There would be PTSD going back to work and seeing the area where it occurred.
They will be worried about a copy cat.
Not being followed by the cops there won't...there are plenty of nutters out there.It would be have to be one stupid copy cat.
I am a strong advocate for deporting these people, like you stated in your first post.
Get rid of them. Send them home.
It costs a lot of money to keep these people in jail hey.
Not all his fault but him and Labour have overseen a changing culture towards crime in NZ. They have overseen a rise in gang numbers, rising violence, child violence, cash paid to gangs and overseen 2 terrorist attacks.The difference between the current Police Commissioner and his predecessor is stark - this one comes across as sensible, balanced and compassionate
All I'm gonna say is....Not all his fault but him and Labour have overseen a changing culture towards crime in NZ. They have overseen a rise in gang numbers, rising violence, child violence, cash paid to gangs and overseen 2 terrorist attacks.
This terrorist attack wouldn’t have happened in Australia.
Everyone rightly praised Labours response to Covid and how National wouldn’t have done better. So I’m going to say this terror attack wouldn’t have happened under National. Goes both ways…
I’m bracing for the left wingers to attack me rather than the message as I know it’s a controversial statement 🙈
Yeah, pretty hard going back to the place.Have to feel for the victims obviously. But also the people there who managed to escape as they were there doing their weekly shop.
Then there is the staff. They have a hard enough job at the moment as it is working as an essential worker during a covid outbreak. There would be PTSD going back to work and seeing the area where it occurred.
National wouldn't have done any better had both terror attacks happened under them, in fact it would have gotten way worse.Not all his fault but him and Labour have overseen a changing culture towards crime in NZ. They have overseen a rise in gang numbers, rising violence, child violence, cash paid to gangs and overseen 2 terrorist attacks.
This terrorist attack wouldn’t have happened in Australia.
Everyone rightly praised Labours response to Covid and how National wouldn’t have done better. So I’m going to say this terror attack wouldn’t have happened under National. Goes both ways…
I’m bracing for the left wingers to attack me rather than the message as I know it’s a controversial statement 🙈
Could be right. Could be wrong. All pure conjecture. We will never knowNot all his fault but him and Labour have overseen a changing culture towards crime in NZ. They have overseen a rise in gang numbers, rising violence, child violence, cash paid to gangs and overseen 2 terrorist attacks.
This terrorist attack wouldn’t have happened in Australia.
Everyone rightly praised Labours response to Covid and how National wouldn’t have done better. So I’m going to say this terror attack wouldn’t have happened under National. Goes both ways…
I’m bracing for the left wingers to attack me rather than the message as I know it’s a controversial statement 🙈
If you had a nutter going blatistic with a blade, are you going to try wrestling the knife off him or use the weapon you were trained to use and not put yourself in harms way? I’d go for the later every day of the week.As a life long martial artist I find myself wondering, did any one of the 7 the cops even consider physically restraining this guy before they shot him ?
Not that I particularly care about the perpetrators rights in this case or anything like that, but while I'm not trying to big note or come off as a tough guy or whatever, with my martial arts training I can easily disarm & restrain most people trying to attack me or anyone else with a knife, give me a hand weapon, like say a police baton & the perpetrator would literally have no chance to resist, especially if they are untrained in hand to hand combat.
So if I can do that, why can't the police, especially if there's more than one of them ?
Surely our police force is adequately trained in these areas ? (this paragraph is facetious & somewhat tongue in cheek)
In a strictly legal sense I would think an argument could be made for excessive force eg: a lone nutter with a knife vs 7 cops with firearms.
Again, I don't particularly care about the guys rights, it just made me think what would I have done if I was unlucky enough to be in that supermarket when it happened ?
And my first instinct would've been to disarm, immobilize & subdue, unless he went after one of my kids, then I would've killed him myself with my bare hands.
But I digress, my overall point is what's the protocol before justified use of deadly force ?
This incident somewhat reminded me of that young Maori boy the cops shot to death on Auckland's Norwestern motorway quite a few years back, his only weapon (if you don't count his car ) was a golf club.
Totally different scenarios, but same outcome, considerably less armed lone perpetrator shot & killed by police officers who considerably outnumbered him.
I'll finish this by stating that if the cops shot that supermarket nutter while he was actually in the act of trying to stab someone then yeah I definitely get it, but if not then I do have to wonder, why didn't they just use their considerably superior numbers to physically overwhelm & immobilize him or use non deadly force such as a taser, pepper spray etc ?
Again I don't really care about the guy, it's more about not wanting a police force that uses the threat or use of deadly force as a first response tactic, that's what's fucked the American police force up & we definitely don't need it here.
Best wishes & thoughts to any & all affected by this horrible incident.
Batons?If you had a nutter going blatistic with a blade, are you going to try wrestling the knife off him or use the weapon you were trained to use and not put yourself in harms way? I’d go for the later every day of the week.
You are probably way better trained in martial arts than a policemen. Sure they probably attend courses on how to disarm someone with a knife, but that is practice and its short lived and easily forgotten. Thinking about it, if I saw someone with a knife in a supermarket, I would use my shopping trolly to ram him and keep distance. Two shoppers in theory would have a good chance I would think. This guy was fairly small. Anyway, all conjecture, I'm glad he is no longer a threat.As a life long martial artist I find myself wondering, did any one of the 7 the cops even consider physically restraining this guy before they shot him ?
Not that I particularly care about the perpetrators rights in this case or anything like that, but while I'm not trying to big note or come off as a tough guy or whatever, with my martial arts training I can easily disarm & restrain most people trying to attack me or anyone else with a knife, give me a hand weapon, like say a police baton & the perpetrator would literally have no chance to resist, especially if they are untrained in hand to hand combat.
So if I can do that, why can't the police, especially if there's more than one of them ?
Surely our police force is adequately trained in these areas ? (this paragraph is facetious & somewhat tongue in cheek)
In a strictly legal sense I would think an argument could be made for excessive force eg: a lone nutter with a knife vs 7 cops with firearms.
Again, I don't particularly care about the guys rights, it just made me think what would I have done if I was unlucky enough to be in that supermarket when it happened ?
And my first instinct would've been to disarm, immobilize & subdue, unless he went after one of my kids, then I would've killed him myself with my bare hands.
But I digress, my overall point is what's the protocol before justified use of deadly force ?
This incident somewhat reminded me of that young Maori boy the cops shot to death on Auckland's Norwestern motorway quite a few years back, his only weapon (if you don't count his car ) was a golf club.
Totally different scenarios, but same outcome, considerably less armed lone perpetrator shot & killed by police officers who considerably outnumbered him.
I'll finish this by stating that if the cops shot that supermarket nutter while he was actually in the act of trying to stab someone then yeah I definitely get it, but if not then I do have to wonder, why didn't they just use their considerably superior numbers to physically overwhelm & immobilize him or use non deadly force such as a taser, pepper spray etc ?
Again I don't really care about the guy, it's more about not wanting a police force that uses the threat or use of deadly force as a first response tactic, that's what's fucked the American police force up & we definitely don't need it here.
Best wishes & thoughts to any & all affected by this horrible incident.
Yeah true dat.All I'm gonna say is....
I live in Aus and we have a conservative government.
I'm pretty jealous of NZs gov.
They did have a seige in Sydney which wasn't handled anywhere near as well btw
18 Mar
Compiled from 16 ratings