I'm not wanting to resurrect the karmichael hunt issue of yesteryear, I'd just like to see this world cup become a showcase of how international the game is, not how much it isn't. If Tonga, Samoa etc are as strong as possible then hopefully in the future we'll see players pick Samoa over Australia, Tonga over NZ... NZ over Australia and so on...
NZ doesn't really need Hunt so my argument might not stand... but yeah... I reckon relaxing the eligibility rules for the WC is a good thing... hopefully Samoa, Fiji and Tonga can maintain good teams after that.
Yeah, I get that you were just using him as an example.
I actually think we need to be more strict on eligibility - not more loose. An international league match is supposed to feature the best 17 available players eligible for that country. If you're the 18th best, that's just too bad - suck it up, use it as motivation in training, and give the selectors no other option the next time around.
I think the mentality that "damn, I missed out on Australia - oh well, I'll just play for Samoa instead" is more harmful to the international game than helpful.
I know of no other sport that swaps players around in the manner in which league does. I think players need to make their choice and stick with it. Or alternatively, only allow them one switch - older players from Australia and New Zealand could pick Samoa, Ireland, and so on to help out those weaker nations, but can't switch back.