So wearing the 11 doesn't count if he's playing in the middle?
Taylor does the majority of his work in the middle, there's no way he could complete 40+ tackles a game by playing exclusively on one flank, so at what point is he a lock instead of a second rower? Docker spends more time on the edges than
Taylor does.
This is what I was getting at when I said it was a technicality not to include lock. The game has changed to a point where numbers have very little meaning, and the only thing that changes in regards to the lock position is how individual teams use the position for the way they play the game. The fact that we still recognise the difference between lock and second row is based on a bygone era where the differences in those positions actually meant something.
Merrin isn't a lock, hes a prop with 13 on his back, Parker isn't a prop, he's a back rower with 10 on his back. The fact is Watmough is a prop with an 11 on his back, but not to include him based on number when
Taylor spends more time in the middle than on the fringes really muddies the water in regards to who does and doesn't qualify as a back rower.
Lets look at the locks for a moment.
Docker (Cleary intends on turning him into a prop)
Nuuausala (Prop turned lock)
Watmough (Second rower turned lock)
Sims (second rower turned lock)
Eastwood (Second/Prop turned lock)
Merrin (Prop turned lock)
Even we're attempting to do it with Lousi
My point here is that if we want a comparison then it has to be apples to apples. Either we compare the back row as 11,12,13 or as just 11,12 based on their position as opposed to their role in the team which is dependent on what the coach wants not what the jersey says.
As I've said all along,
Taylor is in good form (but I could argue not even career form for him) but no matter which comparison we go with IMO he's not the form lock of the comp whether by stats or influence on a game.
I'm still keen to know what it is that makes him the form second rower though.