From what I can see this thread is the defacto discussion about the competence, or lack of it, of the Auckland Council and government departments that run the place.
So here goes:
An existing lane may be dedicated to cyclists and pedestrians ahead of separate bridge.
Bikes could take over one lane on Auckland Harbour Bridge
A lane on Auckland Harbour Bridge could be closed to cars, so cyclists and pedestrians can use it.
Transport Minister Michael Wood yesterday confirmed the Government wants to build a new separate bridge - at an estimated cost of $785 million - alongside the Auckland Harbour Bridge, specifically for walkers, runners and cyclists.
Ahead of that the Government is considering devoting an existing bridge lane to active transport, a plan that is supported by Auckland councillors Pippa Coom and Chris Darby.
Coom said there was plenty of demand for it.
"The missing link across the harbour bridge is for walking and cycling and also all the other e-mobility people are using now... people in wheelchairs, scootering, using skateboards," Coom said.
"We've got to plan for that and we've got to get this connection in place."
Darby said a bridge for cyclists and pedestrians had a strong business case, would be useful for commuters, and would become a tourist attraction.
Plans for a Skypath attached to the existing harbour bridge were scrapped in March.
"There has been a lot of false hope and false starts on the Skypath, the northern pathway across the Auckland harbour," Darby said.
"Now we've got absolute government commitment and more importantly, you've got a budget - so finally we've got legs."
Cycling campaigner Bevan Woodward supports trialling the use of one lane of the Auckland harbour bridge for walking and cycling.
He said yesterday that overseas experience showed taking a lane away would not grind the city to a halt.
Construction of the new bridge, next to the existing harbour bridge, could start as soon as next year and is expected to take six years to complete.